Sri Lanka’s minority religious groups are concerned after Buddhist hardliners reacted angrily to the President’s proposed new constitution.
President Maithripala Sirisena’s new constitution, proposed on 9 Jan., would decentralise power in a bid to prevent ethnic tensions in the country, but Buddhist hardliners say it contains provisions that regulate the power of the Buddhist clergy. The Justice and Buddha Sasana Minister, Wijeyasayadasa Rajapashe, denied this claim, saying they are intended only to enable the government to discipline monks who break the law.
Others who oppose the change say that it is an attempt by the government to be more “likeable” to Western nations.
Buddhism currently enjoys “the foremost place” in the Sri Lankan constitution. Article 9 decrees that “Sri Lanka shall give to Buddhism the foremost place and accordingly it shall be the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana [message]”.
Hardliners blasted the President’s proposal. “We request Buddhist monks to boycott the courts of this country,” Gnanasara Thera, spokesperson for extremist Buddhist group Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), told the Tamil Guardian. “The government [will have] to convert every coconut tree into a gallows and every school into a prison to suppress the Sinhala [the dominant Sri Lankan ethnic group] Buddhist people.”
The constitutional change could be “good or bad news” for religious minorities, including Christians, who comprise around 7 per cent of the population, and Muslims, who account for 10 per cent, said Sheila Singh, a researcher for Open Doors, a global charity that serves Christians who live under pressure because of their faith.
“It’s good news because it’s another milestone in the reformation that the Sirisena administration has been doing,” she told World Watch Monitor. “Last year, the Parliament successfully adopted the 19th amendment of the constitution, which devolved the many powers of Executive Presidency, which had been in force since 1978. The religious police unit established by the former President, which was used to further create tension between the Buddhists and the religious minorities, was also abolished last year.
“Following these changes, we have seen a relatively improved situation for the religious minorities. But the caveat is that while the current government offers a more open and inclusive governance, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe dismissed the allegations that the foremost place given to Buddhism and the unitary nature of the country are being removed in the new constitution.
“Nationalist parliamentarians and groups such as the Sinhale National Movement continue to guard the claimed identity of Sri Lanka at the expense of religious and ethnic minorities. The constitutional change may push through, but we are yet to see how this will really protect and integrate the religious minorities,” Singh said.
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe told the Daily Mirror: “Some say the foremost place given to Buddhism and the unitary nature of the country are being diluted through the new constitution. No one wants to divide the country. Most of us, including me, are Buddhists. I am Sinhalese and I need to unite the whole country. For those who speak of Buddhism losing its foremost place in the constitution, I will make a special statement in Parliament. I ask the small parties not to politicise this issue. The new constitution will be based on the aspirations of the people.”
Thomas Muller, a persecution analyst for Open Doors, added: “While it is encouraging to see that President Sirisena is sticking to his election promise and weakening the very strong constitutional role of the President, it will be much harder to overcome the ethnic and religious tensions in the country. It is true that hardline Buddhist groups like BBS are no longer visible and speaking out. But on the other hand, the Colombo Telegraph has reported that attacks against the Muslim minority and Protestant Christians still continue, though not as prominently as under the former President, who used Buddhist supremacism to strengthen his power base. It remains to be seen whether Sri Lanka does indeed become an encouraging and positive example of ceasing persecution.”
Muslims are particularly concerned after a nationalist slogan was spray-painted onto the gates of Muslim homes in the Sri Lankan capital, Colombo.
The constitutional change may push through, but we are yet to see how this will really protect and integrate the religious minorities.
The slogan, “Sinha le”, which means lion’s blood (owing to the legendary origins of the Sinhalese people as emanating from the union between a human princess and a lion), was spray-painted on walls in other parts of the city, displayed on stickers and posters on vehicles and shared on social media.
During the colonial period, foreigners in Sri Lanka were labelled “asinhala” (un-Sinhala); both Christians and Muslims suffered attacks. This nationalism has endured today through groups such as the Bodu Bala Sena, which wants a Sinhala-only nation.
“Reports of new campaigns that may seek to sow hatred and incite discrimination, hostility or even violence against minorities in Sri Lanka are deeply concerning,” Olof Blomqvist, Press Officer at Amnesty International, told The Sunday Leader. “The past years in Sri Lanka have seen a disturbing trend where some political leaders have sought to manufacture religious tensions. This has resulted in a jump in attacks on religious minorities like Christians and Muslims. Sri Lanka’s political leaders must do more to stop this trend, not try to add fuel to the fire.”
Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, speaking at an event celebrating Sri Lanka’s oldest Catholic newspaper, Gnanartha Pradeepaya, on 11 Jan. said: “We must move away from the era when we thought of ourselves as Sinhala, Tamil or Muslim individually, or as Buddhist, Hindu, Islamic or Catholic.
“What is required of us today is not to indulge in the hateful, racial and religious ideologies that can result in being imprisoned in the dark attitudes of the past. It is a need of the times to be bold enough to ban political parties and other extremists that base their manifestoes on racial and religious ideologies. It is our primary responsibility to protect the identity of the majority and at the same time to protect the identities of minorities,” Ranith said.
Sri Lanka fell out of Open Doors International’s World Watch List in 2016, which ranks the top 50 countries where it is most difficult to live as a Christian. In 2015 it was at No. 44, while in 2014 it was No. 29. It remains on Open Doors’ list of Persecution Watch Countries.