Aasiya Noreen, commonly known as Asia Bibi, received the death penalty in 2010 after she allegedly made derogatory comments about Islam’s prophet, Muhammad, during an argument with a Muslim woman.
In June 2009, Noreen was picking berries in the fields as a day labourer in Sheikhupura, outside Lahore in eastern Pakistan. It was hot. She brought water to a female co-worker, who objected that the touch of a Christian had made the water haram, or religiously forbidden for Muslims. The woman apparently told Noreen to convert to Islam in order to become purified of her ritual impurity. Noreen’s rejoinder was perceived as an insult to Islam. She was arrested, accused of blasphemy against the prophet and the Quran, and has been in prison ever since.
The Muslim woman, with her sister, were the only two eyewitnesses in the case, but the defence failed to convince the appeals judges that their evidence lacked credibility.
In the Lahore High Court appeal hearing in October 2014, Bibi’s then-lawyer, Naeem Shakir, argued that the main complainant in the case, the local Muslim cleric Mohamed Salaam, had not heard Bibi blaspheme, and that his original complaint had been lodged only five days after the women’s quarrel. Shakir argued that during her 2010 trial the only reason given for this delay was “deliberation and consultation”, and said that Salaam had acknowledged this in court.
Salaam was filmed by an international film crew for a film about Bibi in 2014, saying that it is his religious obligation to defend the dignity of Muhammad and that is why he decided to be a witness before the court. He said he heard Bibi confess to blasphemy when she was brought before a village council several days after the quarrel.
Her other main accuser, Mohamed Imran, owner of the field in which Noreen worked, was not present at the time of the quarrel either; he was away from the village.
However, the High Court ruled that it had no choice but to let the conviction and death penalty stand, based on the way the country’s laws are written, and on what it characterised as an inept trial defence.
At the same time, the court asked Pakistan’s lawmakers to craft legislation that would empower trial courts to apply a test that would make future blasphemy convictions much more difficult to achieve.
‘You have to be in hiding’
Noreen’s lawyer then filed an appeal with Pakistan’s Supreme Court and in July 2015 it agreed it would hear Noreen’s case.
Commentators praised the court for its courage to hear the appeal in the face of strong public sentiment against anyone seen to denigrate Islam, with some calling it a “historic day for Pakistan”.
However, the appeal stalled in late 2016 when one member of the three-judge panel recused himself.
In April 2018 Pakistan’s chief justice, Saqib Nisar, told Noreen’s lawyer, Saif-ul-Malook, that he would hear Asia’s appeal "soon".
After that announcement, Malook, who was also the prosecution lawyer in the case of the murder of Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer (who was murdered for his opposition of the blasphemy law and support for Asia Bibi), was placed under 24-hour protection. Ahead of the hearing in Islamabad on 8 October he told the Associated Press, “I have lost my health. I am a high-blood-pressure patient, my privacy is totally lost. You have to be in hiding,” as everyone knew his identity. “They look at this house and they know this is the home of a person who can be killed at any time by angry mullahs."
Pakistan’s Supreme Court was the last possibility for Noreen to see her death sentence repealed, though had the court rejected her appeal she could have appealed to the president for mercy. The Supreme Court, on 31 October 2018, threw out her conviction by the lower court, ruling that the government's case against her was without foundation. The decision sparked widespread protests by Islamic hardliners, who demanded an inquest of the court's ruling.
While the Supreme Court considered a review of her case, requested by the Imam who filed a complaint against her in 2009, Noreen was held in a secret location in Islamabad. Her lawyer fled to the Netherlands on 7 November out of concern for his safety but returned for the hearing by the Supreme Court on 29 January 2019.
A panel of three judges, chaired by the new Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, ruled there was no ground for a review as the petitioner had not been able to highlight any mistakes in the original verdict.
Noreen's case has divided Pakistan, and it’s not believed safe for her to live in the country. Her family have had to move several times during her incarceration in Multan jail, 570kms south of the capital Islamabad.
Several countries have offered her and her family asylum and she is expected to leave Pakistan.
Bibi’s case attracted global attention, much of it critical of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, which critics contend are routinely abused as a pretext to settle personal scores.
In 2011 two prominent Pakistani politicians, Taseer and Shahbaz Bhatti, were assassinated after they spoke publicly in Bibi’s defence.
Following the killing of Taseer, Bibi’s husband said she was “very afraid”. “She knows the Muslims have announced a price on her head and would go to any lengths to kill her,” he said. Authorities increased her security and moved her to an all-women facility, Multan Prison.
In May 2018 another politician who has championed the country’s minority communities, Ahsan Iqbal, survived an assassination attempt by a gunman protesting against changes to the blasphemy laws.
Pope Benedict XVI had made a public plea for clemency, while the EU’s Special Envoy for Freedom of Religion or Belief, Jan Figeľ, had told Pakistani officials that the renewal of their export privileges to Europe would depend on the release of Asia Bibi.